Next: Course placement
Up: Placement test content
Previous: Internally developed tests
Table 19 shows the number of respondents using various commercially produced tests. The Brigham Young University CAPE (Computer Adaptive Placement Exam) and the Advanced Placement (AP) subject tests were the most common commercially produced tests used by the respondents. Part of this is no doubt due to the availability of these tests for the most commonly taught languages. Widespread use in other programs and the consistency of the results were the most cited reasons for choosing the tests (Table 20), though some programs commented that the decision to use the test was out of their hands (i.e., a decision by the Dean) or that practical considerations, such as the lack of available staff for testing duties during the summer, were also considerations.
Table 19:
Externally produced tests used by respondents
| Test |
Programs |
| AP subject test |
38 |
| CAPE (BYU) |
21 |
| Wisconsin Test |
8 |
| ACTFL OPI |
7 |
| CLEP |
5 |
| SAT II subject test |
2 |
| Michigan Test |
1 |
| SOPI |
1 |
| Japanese Proficiency Test |
1 |
| MLPA |
1 |
| AATG Test* |
1 |
| University of Oregon NFLRC STAMP* |
1 |
| College Board* |
1 |
| sras* |
1 |
*Write-in response
Table 20:
Reason for choosing commercial test
| Reason |
Respondents |
| Widely used in other programs |
21 |
| Gives consistent results |
18 |
| Have always used it |
8 |
| Familiar to teachers |
7 |
| No other option |
4 |
| Ease of administration* |
1 |
| Cost* |
1 |
| Convenience* |
1 |
| Faculty not available in summer* |
1 |
| Dean's decision* |
1 |
*Write-in response
As with the internally developed tests, content review and piloting on current students were the most common ways of validating externally produced tests (Table 21). One program cited a high correlation obtained between a previously used test. Perhaps because of the inherent mismatch between a standardized test and an individual program's curriculum, matching the test content to course objectives was not used to the extent it was for locally produced tests.
Table 21:
Validation method for externally developed test
| Validation method |
Responses |
| Review by instructors/department head |
37 |
| Piloting on current students |
31 |
| Matching contents to course objectives |
7 |
| Item analysis |
2 |
| Compared favorably to previous test* |
1 |
*Write-in response
Next: Course placement
Up: Placement test content
Previous: Internally developed tests
Martyn Clark
2004-12-21