|About RFL | Current Issue | Past Issues | Supplement Issues | Subscribe | Announcements | Editorial Staff | Submissions | Contact RFL|
TABLE OF CONTENTS
Articles should report original research or present an original framework that links previous research, educational theory, and teaching practices. Full-length articles should be no more than 8,500 words in length, excluding appendices. Additionally, each submission should include an abstract of no more than 150 words, and a list of five to seven keywords for index and search purposes. We encourage articles that take advantage of the electronic format by including hypermedia links to multimedia material both within and outside the article. All article manuscripts submitted to RFL go through a two-step review process.
Step 1: Internal review. The editors of the journal first review each manuscript to see if it meets the basic requirements for articles published in the journal (i.e., that it reports on original research or presents an original framework linking previous research, educational theory, and teaching practices), and that it is of sufficient quality to merit external review. Note that RFL follows the guidelines of the sixth edition of the Publication Manual of the American Psychological Association published by the American Psychological Association (APA). Manuscripts submitted to RFL must conform to APA format. Manuscripts that do not meet these requirements are not sent out for further review. This internal review takes about 1–2 weeks.
Step 2: External review. Submissions that meet the requirements above are then sent out for blind peer review from two to three experts in the field, either from the journal’s editorial board or from a larger list of reviewers. This second review process takes 2–3 months. Following the external review, the authors are sent copies of the external reviewers’ comments and are notified as to the decision (accept as it is, accept pending changes, revise and resubmit, or reject).back to top
Short articles, usually no more than 2,000 words, in the Discussion Forum generally discuss material previously published in RFL and may also present replies by the authors to the issues raised in those comments. The Discussion Forum contents are meant to be constructive and professional exchanges about an area of foreign language reading. Discussions go through the same review process as that for full length articles.back to top
The journal welcomes reviews of recent publications and resources focusing on a variety of aspects of reading, including research, professional development, classroom approaches, teaching texts, and computer mediated materials. Reviewers should give a clear and succinct description and provide the reader with the means of evaluating the relevance of the material to the targeted field of theory and practice. Reviews should normally include references to published theory and relevant research, and reviews providing a critical or evaluative overview of several publications that have made a distinct contribution to the field of reading research and practice are particularly welcome. Reviews of individual books or reading instructional software are generally 1,200–1,600 words in length. Reviews of multiple texts can be longer. Reviews should include the name, institutional affiliation, e-mail address, URL (if applicable), and a short biographical statement (maximum 50 words) of the reviewer(s). The following information should be included in a table at the beginning of the review:
Publisher city and country
Number of pages
Contact Xiangying Jiang (firstname.lastname@example.org) if you are interested in having material reviewed or in serving as a reviewer.back to top
RFL has two features, Readings on L2 Reading: Publications in Other Venues, which first appeared in the October 2005 issue, and RFL Revisited: Past Articles Today, which first appeared in the October 2006 issue.
Readings on L2 Reading: Publications in Other Venues, which appears once a year in the October issue, offers an archive of articles published in other venues during the previous year. It serves as a valuable tool to readers of RFL. Articles may treat any topic within the scope of RFL and second language reading. Articles are organized by topic. This feature includes titles of the articles as well as brief summaries. Two additional sections include a list of books, volumes, and dissertations that treat second language reading. For more information, please contact the editor of this feature, Cindy Brantmeier, an associate professor of applied linguistics and Spanish, Washington University in St. Louis. RFL readers are requested to send to Dr. Brantmeier relevant information on appropriate articles such as author(s), journal, date of publication, and, if possible, a brief summary. Please send to email@example.com
RFL Revisited: Past Articles Today brings previous RFL articles that remain relevant and reprises them in current issues. We ask the author to comment on the article as well as to have others comment on it. Note that RFL does not accept unsolicited submissions for this feature.
Please list the names, institutions, e-mail addresses of all authors, and also include a brief biographical statement (maximum 50 words, in sentence format) for each author. (This information will be removed when the articles are distributed for blind review.) Authors must accompany their submission with a statement that the manuscripts has not been published elsewhere or is not being considered for publication elsewhere.
Submissions may be submitted in the following formats: (a) Microsoft Word documents and (b) RTF documents. If a different format is required in order to better handle foreign language fonts, please consult with the editors. Submissions can be transmitted by electronic mail: Send the main document and any accompanying files (images, etc.) to firstname.lastname@example.org
Please check the General Publication Policies below for additional guidelines.back to top
The following policies apply to all articles, reviews, and commentaries:
1. All submissions must conform to the requirements of the Publication Manual of the American Psychological Association (6th edition). Authors are responsible for the accuracy of references and citations, which must be in APA format. Manuscripts may be rejected if they do not meet the APA requirements
2. Manuscripts that have already been published elsewhere or are being considered for publication elsewhere are not eligible to be considered for publication in RFL. It is the responsibility of the author to inform the editor of the existence of any similar work that is already published or under consideration for publication elsewhere.
3. Authors of accepted manuscripts will assign to RFL the permanent right to electronically distribute the article.
4. The editors of RFL reserve the right to make editorial changes in any manuscript accepted for publication for the sake of style or clarity. Authors will be consulted only if the changes are substantial.
5. Articles are copyrighted by their respective authors, but if published after electronic appearance, RFL will be acknowledged as the initial locus of publication.
6. The views expressed in RFL do not necessarily represent the views of the National Foreign Language Resource Center, the University of Hawai‘i College of Language, Linguistics, and Literature, or the University of Hawai‘i Department of Second Language Studies.
7. RFL expects authors to adhere to ethical standards for research involving human subjects. Manuscript contributors will provide a statement to RFL stating that:
1) They have adhered to the human subject review established by their institution2) If their institution does not have an institutional review process, or if the institutional review process does not include the following procedures, contributors must meet the following standards.
A. Participants have been informed that they are research subjects and the results of the study will be presented for publication.
B. Partcipants have been informed that participation is voluntary and that they may withdraw their participation at any time.
C. Participants have been informed of the purpose of the research and provided a general outline of the project.
D. Participants have been informed how their confidentiality will be maintained.
E. Participants have been informed of any potential risks.
F. Participants, or their guardian, have signed an informed consent form for their participation in the study.
Research should generally include the following sections:
An Abstract (no more than 120 words)
Five to seven keywords for index and search purposes
A Method section:
A Results section:
A Discussion section:
References in APA format
Appendices of instrument(s) used